Timothy Keller’s book is a remarkable, easy read that masterfully explains difficult concepts to people who aren’t all that good at difficult concepts. His book is written, organized, and crafted beautifully. Anyone with a high school level education could easily read this book and understand the complex philosophical arguments he discusses in defense of what we call “God.” It is important however to note that this book is not just his reasoning for God, but as well his reasoning for Christianity. Put simply, it’s a Christian apologist book about Christianity in an Age of Skepticism. There’s nothing wrong about that, but you should know what you’re reading.
Onto his arguments. Keller summarizes the basic arguments for God we love and adore: Aristotle’s First Cause Argument, the Islamic Kalam Cosmological Argument, the Watchmaker Argument, etc. He then attempts to refute the traditional anti-God arguments such as the problem of evil argument. I myself am placed in a difficult situation when it comes to these God arguments: for one, I find all the classical arguments for God (the ones that Keller uses) to be weak and insufficient, and at the same time, I find all the classical arguments against God (the ones that Keller refutes) to be equally weak and insufficient. As a Muslim, my faith requires me to believe that the idea of God is rationally deductible, and I struggle with finding a sure-fire way to philosophically prove God (I haven’t looked too much into it though, but I’ll write more on this later). Most Christians, notably Catholics, do not need to prove God rationally as a principle of their faith, but it certainly helps. They need only to prove Christianity rationally, and the concept of God naturally follows through
Thus he argues his Christian apologist views. These stem from his belief in a “historical record” of the Ressurection of Christ, amongst other things. Now I am not Christian, so I’m obviously disagree with his views for a number of reasons. I won’t delve too much into what these arguments of his are, but he does wonderfully in presenting them and explaining why he feels Christianity is the way to go.
To summarize, Keller wrote a masterful book on the argument for God and Christianity. Whether you agree with his conclusions or not, he certainly explains himself thoroughly. He writes simple enough for any audience as well, without sounding unintelligent. If you are interesting in reading about Christian apology or about the philosophy of God, there is no better book to read than this one.
Thank you for that.
LikeLike
Sure, no problem! Thanks for commenting, hope to see more from you here soon.
LikeLike
Before any judgement is made on the supposed validity of either Christianity or Islam it should be incumbent on their followers to investigate the archaeology of Professors Israel Finkelstein and Ze’ev Herzog.
LikeLike
Interesting! I’ll look into the people you named, thanks for giving the information. I’ve heard of the first one, but I haven’t looked into him so I’ll do that soon. The Islamic narratives are pretty different from the Biblical ones at times, and for one their are no dates as there are in the Bible, which makes things pretty different. Thanks for stopping by, hope to hear more from you soon!
Cheers,
Lux
LikeLike
Pingback: Why I am not Christian | Whispers of Satan
Pingback: Why I am not a Christian | Whispers of Satan
Pingback: What’s up with “A Reason for God”? | Whispers of Satan
The effort Christians put into rational proofs of God always surprises me. We humans are no more perfect at rationality than we are at anything else. The way to find God is to accept that we are not what we should be, and not what we want to be. I think God comes to those who humbly seek Him and thus come to know Him through their experience of His grace. Knowledge of Him comes later through the (I am a Christian) work of Christ and the Holy Spirit in our lives.
LikeLike
Are you familiar with “Russel’s Chicken” and “The problem of induction”. They bring an entire world of possibilities to the arguments for God..
http://www.noogenesis.com/pineapple/Russell/chicken.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction
Also, here’s a quote you may like from a Hindu scripture:
And one from the first Sikh guru:
Let me know if you think of anything. Cheers.
Lux
LikeLike
I think my first point is well made by the quote from the first Sikh guru. As to arguments concerning the validity of inductive reasoning, let me give you a quote from Damon Runyon. “The race is not always to the swift nor the battle to the strong, but that is the way you bet them.” It is not likely we are ever to have certainty about anything but when it comes to God we do have to place our bet.
LikeLike